i hope people are able to understand my arguement explained here
http://northwestindiana.com/discussionforum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=5383&sid=2ad442559f4a7d9187ea68f777376235 but with all of the vitriol i think the arguement gets watered down. so for clarity, here it is again.
im not arguing for or against the insurance program or anything other than bussing in this thread. im simple explaining that to say on the one hand its ok to fund buses through casinos but not ok to fund other things...is hypocritical.
conversly it would be hypocritical for me to oppose funding buses through casino funds on principle...but to support other budget items through casinos as well....but thats not my arguement. my basic arguement is that busess, based on the limited usage and benefit to tax payers should not be funded by the city at all.